Got Questions?
This Q&A is intended to create an opportunity for reasoning together and learning from one another and past women’s councils as encouraged by the Lord in regards to the June 20th Revelation.
Please “measure your words before giving voice to them”, and if anything is shared that ought not; we reserve the right to remove such comments. Please keep it kind & mindful of each other. “inasmuch as ye have done it unto one of the least of these my brethren, ye have done it unto me.” Matthew 25:40
Community Questions & Answers
It seems clear many believe there is an issue with overturning a council and its results.
Can you explain how you came to that understanding? What scripture/revelation, etc disallows it?
Do you have other thoughts or solutions for preventing and also correcting councils that do not align with the Lord's instructions?
Asked by: Kylee Snuffer on April 11, 2025
View Answers (1)
I would not say that is clear. In fact, many on our council are concerned with voting to make a rule that councils can not be overturned. What is interesting to me is that on the Sunday, April 6 zoom meeting, one of the conference organizers was asked who holds them accountable. She responded, God does. This is the same response many women who have served on a Council (not just this one under scrutiny) have claimed. That they have fasted and prayed and are accountable to God. If Conferences begin to be used as a means of are “holding councils” accountable, then the logical question does arise…who holds conference organizers accountable? What if women dispute this conference? And they organize a conference to dispute and hold accountable this conference and the organizers? Round and round it goes.
Answered by: Anonymous (WCL1/WCL2) on April 11, 2025
Add Your Answer
Did he provide names/specific women to be contacted that he claimed as home fellowship? If so, were they contacted to participate?
“If you have any further concerns about my worthiness or behavior, please contact the women in my home fellowship.”
Asked by: Anonymous on April 11, 2025
View Answers (1)
He did not send names or information for any women.
Answered by: Anonymous (WCL1/WCL2) on April 11, 2025
Add Your Answer
Again I am unaware of conditions being set as a standard of WCL (as well as anyone but the individual signing a certificate dictating whether or not they do so), so this appears to have been an internal decision that I am interested in understanding.
“The outcome is that you retain your priesthood certificate on the condition that your wife . . . name is removed.”
Asked by: Anonymous on April 11, 2025
View Answers (1)
The Lord has not given any provision for a certificate to be revoked other than the one outlined in scripture which is to have a council of 12 women who are unanimous in the revocation. In this instance, the wife wanted it stated that she no longer desired her name to be on the certificate. He still retained his certificate. The wife simply wanted the man to know how she felt.
Answered by: Anonymous (WCL1/WCL2) on April 11, 2025
Add Your Answer
Viewing the passing of [MIQ]’s statement to the council, even last minute, in such a negative light seems so wildly outrageous to me that I think I am missing valuable information/context to explain this perspective. With what I have now, to view the delivery of [MIQ]'s side as "tragic", putting you "in a precarious and disadvantaged position". "tainting the proceedings", "underhanded", "inexcusable" is unreasonable. I wouldn't describe those of you I have any experience with as unreasonable, so there may be information I am missing. Can you provide that?
Asked by: Anonymous on April 11, 2025
View Answers (1)
I do not understand the question. If you are referring to the passing along of the MIQ’s defense statement as last minute as during the actual second session proceedings, then it WAS taken into consideration and he DID retain his certificate.
Answered by: Anonymous (WCL1/WCL2) on April 11, 2025
Add Your Answer
I have not been made aware that communication with the man is prohibited, so I am wondering if that was a decision made by the council. Can you clarify and help me understand that decision.
“Thus, by your own admission, you have ongoing and recent contact with [MIQ]. That is a violation of our trust as well. How can you be objective when you are texting back and forth with the very man whose behavior you are called to judge? . . .”
Asked by: Anonymous on April 11, 2025
View Answers (3)
The answer to this is sensitive in nature and will be provided during the conference.
Answered by: Anonymous (WCL1/WCL2) on April 11, 2025
On the very first email invite to be on the council in Dec 2023 it says
“Upon receiving the document on December 28, we ask that you thoroughly review it and keep it in strict confidence, discussing it with no one except your husband to preserve the integrity of the process and to avoid any rumors that could derail or taint the proceedings.”
That’s on the document page, you can read it yourself. There might be more to it, but that’s generally how most councils go. It allows for everyone to have the same information to weigh the matter helps avoid sensitive private information about the man or the witnesses getting out.
Answered by: Shalyce Woodard on April 11, 2025
I have read that section and it did not cross my mind that the subject of the council would be included in that admonition.
Answered by: Kylee on April 11, 2025
Add Your Answer
What reasons were shared among those on what would become WCL for [Disputer] being excluded after #26 had extended the invite to join?
“Nov 21, 2023 (#26 of WCL1) called me ([Disputer] [Disputer]) to ask if I would be on a WCL for [MIQ]. I said I would help them hold a successful WCL for [MIQ].
Dec 3, 2023 (#26 of WCL1) called to let me know there are women on the council who do not want me to be on the council.”
Asked by: Anonymous on April 11, 2025
View Answers (1)
Where did you obtain this information? If from the disputers document, that is not accurate information and dates.
Perhaps you can ask this at the conference and it can be clarified there.
Answered by: Anonymous (WCL1/WCL2) on April 11, 2025
Add Your Answer
I am interested in hearing the reasoning and decisions behind the copyright efforts.
Asked by: Kylee on April 11, 2025
View Answers (1)
I copyrighted my emails to prevent [Disputer] from using partial segments and “convenient” redactions and then presenting them out of context to fit into her narrative.
I wanted them to be represented in their full and complete state and context.
Answered by: Amberli Peterson (WCL1/WCL2) on April 11, 2025
Add Your Answer
How much wood would a woodchuck chuck if a woodchuck could chuck wood?
Asked by: Shalyce Woodard on April 10, 2025
View Answers (4)
Here’s a WCL1 Council Member OR a WCL2 Council Member’s Response
Green
Answered by: Shalyce Woodard (WCL1/WCL2) on April 10, 2025
Hey there,
Kudos on acquiring wcl1defense.com! It's thrilling to start a new online adventure.
Following our initiative to help new domain owners, I'm reaching out with a valuable resource for wcl1defense.com.
I'm talking about our the Google Maps Lead Collector - a Chrome extension that helps you discover local businesses in your area.
I've created a quick video that illustrates how it works:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=20&v=1Dd7i4vNgu0
This free tool enables you to:
Quickly gather targeted business leads
Locate leads in specific sectors
Optimize your lead generation
Begin building your business immediately
You'll get 50 leads per search with no limit on the number of searches!
Simply grab your free copy from the video description.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=20&v=1Dd7i4vNgu0
Here's to your success with wcl1defense.com! Please reach out with any questions.
Best regards,
Sang Raney
Online Marketing Expert
Answered by: Sang Raney (WCL1/WCL2) on April 13, 2025
Here’s a prior womens council members answer
Orange
Answered by: Anonymous on April 10, 2025
And if someone answers the question that hasn’t been on a women’s council the answers go here.
Answered by: Shalyce Woodard on April 10, 2025
Add Your Answer